The New York Times Questions Kamala Harris’s Presidential Style

By
Conservative Research Group
-

While you slog your way through the remainder of your investments and wait for Kamala to announce her VP choice, it’s worth asking: Does Kamala look presidential enough?

The New York Times will do it for you if you’re not in the mood to ponder.

She is instead wearing her usual tone-on-tone silk shells with pussy-bow tops. She is wearing her signature pearls and 70-millimeter Manolo Blahnik shoes. The perfect camouflage for the No. 2 executive of the country over the past four years. The second executive is a bit dull, somber, and deferential.

Does it look presidential to you?

This is an important question in an election where so many things about one candidate are potentially pioneering – she could be the first female president or the first woman president of color. She might also be the first president of South Asian descent.

Ashley Allison, former Biden-Harris adviser and chief executive of Watering Hole Media, said that “how you present yourself in a leadership role is a factor every woman must consider.” She said that Ms. Harris is trying to break the “biggest, thickest, and largest glass ceiling” there could be.

New York Times, does how she dresses matter as much or more than what she represents? Maybe a road map of how the Harris-Whomever government will get us out of this recession? Maybe a future president Harris will explain how they plan to deal with Iran if it becomes nuclear. These pallets of money worked well to deter the terrorists. Harris’ only policy statements are the Atlanta rally she held with a twerking Megan Thee Stallion and the announcement of her campaign with Drag Queens and Trans Friends on “RuPaul Drag Race” and the announcement of the endorsements she received from Bush-era RINOs and NeverTrumpers through her “Kamala Wins X” account. She has not given us any other information about how she will govern.

The New York Times’ first concern is that Harris will look great doing anything she chooses to do… or do not do.

It’s not about some objective measure of chic. It’s about more than being endorsed by Vogue. Ms. Harris did. It’s what the voters make of Ms. Harris’s clothing; what they think about it. In many ways, clothes are a symbol of the feelings that voters have about a particular candidate, both good and bad. This is especially true of female candidates.

Vogue’s hilarious endorsement of Harris’ “presidential fashion choices” is below.

Kamala Harris, whether she was wearing a custom Chloe to a state dinner or a denim coat bedazzled with the Pride flag throughout her tenure, has used clothing as a way to communicate authority, political statements, and competence. Her run for the presidency of the United States is sure to be as well-thought-out.

This was as slick as cotton candy and just as cloying. A single mother is not concerned with Harris’ designer and custom-made clothing. She cares more about the clothing for her children. Harris’ fashion and company choices are “elitist”, especially for a candidate who says she wants to be president of all Americans.

Harris is a master of accessorizing. While the rest of us are content with costumes, Tiffany will only do for Harris.

While Kamala Harris may look chic and strong with her custom-made pantsuit, silk-pressed hair, and a silk-pressed suit, there is no need to worry, Bidenomics works.

Harris, the world’s most dressed-for-success abject failure. Are you prepared for four years like this?