That Time the FBI Dropped Four Investigations Into Those Filthy Clintons Before the 2016 Election

The Durham report makes me think of the movie Fight Club. The more you watch it, the more clues and “easter eggs” you will find.

The mention that the FBI dropped a quadruple of investigations on Arkansas’s first feculent families — and persecuted Trump — before the 2016 elections is one of my favorite morsels.

FACT-O-RAMA! The FBI worked for Hillary and against Trump prior to the 2016 elections, but the Hillda beast still got spanked.

When Killary was Secretary of State, the Clinton Foundation received hundreds of millions in donations. Many of these came from foreign groups and individuals. She was also stepping up her campaign for the White House.

Lefty Pravda wants you to think that the Durham report doesn’t contain any smoking guns, but in fact it does:

Section IV.A.3 (b) explains in more detail what happened before the FBI received the first receipt.
According to a report from Australia’s Headquarters of Information on July 28, 2016, regarding comments made allegedly in a bar on May 6, 2016 George Papadopoulos – an unpaid advisor for the Trump campaign – the government had no verified intelligence indicating that Trump or his campaign were involved in a conspiracies or collaborative relationships with officials of the Russian government. According to the evidence collected in the numerous exhaustive and expensive federal investigations into these matters, which included the current investigation, neither U.S. Law Enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appeared to have any evidence of collusion at the beginning of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation. – Durham report, Page 8.

The FBI did not only have no evidence of Trump and Russia collusion but they also “ignored”, or “explained” away, any evidence that was inconvenient to them.

The Office believes that the FBI willfully or knowingly ignored information that contradicted the narrative that Trump and Russia were in collusion. The FBI Inspection Division Report states that investigators “repeatedly ignored[ d] [or] explained[ ed]] away evidence contra to the theory that the Trump campaign… had conspired …. The FBI Inspection Division Report states that the investigators “repeatedly ignored[ d] or explained[ ed] away evidence contrary to the theory the Trump campaign… had conspired with Russia.” Unfortunately, this did not happen. – Durham report, page 305.

The Durham report shows that the FBI ignored Hillary’s nefarious activities four times, despite the fact there was no evidence of Russian interference.

FACT-O-RAMA! Durham’s report on 316 pages contains 340 mentions of the name “Clinton”.

Hillary took a lot of money from foreigners. That’s not okay unless you have the last name Clinton. When one of the FBI’s own confidential informants made “a potentially illegal and improper campaign contribution”, they dropped their investigation.

I have added bold font:

Crossfire Hurricane: The FBI’s investigation and the speed with which it was opened
The FBI’s approach to the 2016 presidential election, based on unanalyzed and uncorroborated raw intelligence, was a notable departure from its previous approaches to possible foreign attempts at election interference aimed at the Clinton Campaign. In the 18 months before the 2016 presidential election, as described in Section IV.B., the FBI had to deal with several proposed investigations which could have affected the election. The FBI acted with caution in each case. In a case like the one discussed in Section IV.B.l., FBI Headquarters and Department officials demanded that Clinton and other officials and candidates who appeared as targets of foreign influence be given defensive briefings. In a second case, the FBI decided to close an investigation when one of their long-time and valued CHSs (confidential sources) went beyond what had been authorized and made a financial contribution that was improper and potentially illegal to the Clinton campaign for a foreign entity. This donation was a precursor of a larger donation which the FBI contemplated. In a third case, involving the Clinton Foundation, senior FBI officials and Department officials imposed restrictions on the handling of the matter so that no investigation was conducted in the months prior to the election. These examples also differ from the FBI’s actions in relation to other highly important intelligence it received from an trusted foreign source, pointing out a Clinton campaign plot to vilify Trump through tying him up with Vladimir Putin to divert attention away from her concerns about her use of a personal email server. In contrast to the FBI’s decision to open a full investigation into unknown members of Trump’s campaign on the basis of raw, uncorroborated data, it never conducted any kind of inquiry or tasking, hired any analysts, or produced any analysis products in relation with this information. The FBI took no action despite the fact the intelligence about the Clinton campaign plan was so significant that it prompted the Director to inform the President, Vice-President, Attorney General and Director of FBI within days after receiving the information. Durham report, pages 9-10.

Hillary approved the false Trump-Russia collusion. Who else was aware of this scandal, which is arguably the worst ever in American politics history?

The Bamster

Brennan was briefed on the CIA’s activities based on his notes.
President Obama and senior national security officials about the intelligence. This includes the “alleged approval on July 26, 2016, by Hillary Clinton of a proposal by one of her advisors on foreign policy to vilify Donald Trump through stirring up a controversy claiming Russian security services interference.”

What have we learned so far?
We now know that the FBI is the Democrats’ Stasi. The FBI did not have any evidence to investigate Trump, but they still investigated him anyway to try to bring down Trump. FBI dropped all investigations against Hillary Clinton, or refused to even look at her crimes. Obama was well aware of it.

Do not even begin to mention the FBI’s massive payments to Twitter in order to silence any discussion about Hunter Biden’s laptop. Or their refusal to investigate Hunter. Or the “51 former intelligence” gurus that publicly declared Hunter’s laptop to be “Russian misinformation.”

Houston, there’s a problem with the FBI.