Leaked Call Between Trump and RFK Jr. Shows Surprising Civil Dialogue Amid Disagreements

There is no doubt that America is divided. People tend to tune each other out when they disagree with their political views or visions for the future of the country. In a recent leaked phone call between Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a presidential candidate and former president of the United States, and Donald Trump, current GOP nominee for president, they demonstrated something that’s missing in our world today: civil discourse, even if their policies differed.

The leaked conversation included topics such as childhood vaccinations and of course the attempted assassination of Trump. Trump said that the bullet’s graze on his ear “felt like a mosquito.” Trump said that Biden’s reaching out to him “was very nice.”

In this particular leak, they discussed both the shooting and vaccines. Trump agreed with Kennedy.

Man, I agree with you. You’re right, there’s something wrong with the whole system. Remember that I said I wanted to take small doses. Small doses. You give Bobby a vaccine that looks like 38 different vaccinations and is meant for horses, not babies.

You should give a horse that, but do you know the size? It looks so huge, but then you notice the baby suddenly changing radically. I’ve seen this too many times. You hear it has no impact. You and I have talked about this for a very long time. It would be great if you did something. I think you would benefit from it.

WATCH:

Trump seems to be open to Kennedy being in a Cabinet position.

Kennedy said that he thought the Trump assassination could unite the country. He appeared on NewsNation after the Trump attempt.

Kennedy has declared that he will remain in the race. He made a post on X.

There are a lot of rumors about my meeting with President Trump this morning. We discussed national unity and I plan to meet with Democratic leadership about this as well. No, I’m not quitting the race.

Kennedy apologized for the leak on X. This is exactly what the nation needs — civil discourse between those who may not always agree with each other on policy but can still disagree without shutting one another out.